Tata Steel Standalone, Tata Steel Long Products, Tata Steel United Kingdom (UK), Tata Steel Netherlands and Tata Steel Thailand account for ~ 90% of our global group turnover. This Factsheet represents our ESG performance for these entities.
Note: In FY 2021-22 Standalone figures include performance of the newly amalgamated erstwhile business of Tata Steel BSL Limited.
UOM |
FY-18 |
FY -19 |
FY - 20 |
FY- 21 |
FY - 22 |
|
Basic information |
||||||
Crude Steel Production |
||||||
Tata Steel Standalone |
MnT |
12.48 |
13.23 |
13.16 |
12.19 |
18.38 |
Tata Steel Long Products Limited - Gamharia |
MnT |
- |
- |
0.59 |
0.65 |
0.68 |
Tata Steel UK |
MnT |
3.51 |
3.13 |
3.38 |
3.27 |
3.40 |
Tata Steel Netherlands |
MnT |
6.90 |
6.90 |
6.62 |
6.07 |
6.45 |
Tata Steel Thailand |
MnT |
1.20 |
1.03 |
0.99 |
1.09 |
1.31 |
Environmental |
||||||
CO2 emissions (based on worldsteel user guide V9.5) |
||||||
UOM |
FY - 18 |
FY- 19 |
FY - 20 |
FY - 21 |
FY - 22 |
|
Tata Steel Standalone - Jamshedpur, Kalinganagar, Meramandali |
||||||
Absolute emissions -Scope 1+1.1 |
MnT |
30.5 |
31.7 |
31.1 |
29.4 |
46.2 |
Absolute emissions - Scope 2 |
MnT |
1.2 |
1.2 |
1.1 |
1.0 |
1.7 |
Absolute emissions - Scope 3 |
MnT |
-2.0 |
-1.8 |
-1.8 |
-2.0 |
-3.2 |
Total absolute emissions |
MnT |
29.7 |
31 |
30.4 |
28.3 |
44.7 |
CO2 emissions intensity |
tCO2/tcs |
2.37 |
2.35 |
2.31 |
2.32 |
2.43 |
Tata Steel Long Products Limited - Gamharia |
||||||
Absolute emissions - Scope 1 |
MnT |
- |
- |
3.0 |
3.1 |
3.2 |
Absolute emissions - Scope 2 |
MnT |
- |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Absolute emissions - Scope 3 |
MnT |
- |
- |
-0.3 |
-0.4 |
-0.3 |
Total absolute emissions |
MnT |
- |
- |
2.7 |
2.8 |
3.0 |
CO2 emissions intensity |
tCO2/tcs |
- |
- |
4.52 |
4.29 |
4.39 |
Tata Steel UK |
||||||
Absolute emissions - Scope 1 |
MnT |
7.0 |
6.4 |
7.1 |
6.5 |
6.9 |
Absolute emissions - Scope 2 |
MnT |
0.5 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
Absolute emissions - Scope 3 |
MnT |
0.6 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
Total absolute emissions |
MnT |
8.1 |
7.4 |
8.0 |
7.3 |
7.7 |
CO2 emissions intensity (Port Talbot) |
tCO2/tcs |
2.18 |
2.21 |
2.22 |
2.14 |
2.16 |
Tata Steel Netherlands |
||||||
Absolute emissions - Scope 1+1.1 |
MnT |
13 |
12 |
12 |
11 |
12 |
Absolute emissions - Scope 2 |
MnT |
-(0.15) |
-(0.18) |
-(0.13) |
-(0.06) |
-(0.1) |
Absolute emissions - Scope 3 |
MnT |
0.08 |
0.15 |
0.16 |
0.17 |
0.27 |
Total absolute emissions |
MnT |
13 |
12 |
12 |
11 |
12 |
CO2 emissions intensity (IJmuiden) |
tCO2/tcs |
1.79 |
1.77 |
1.76 |
1.77 |
1.78 |
Tata Steel Thailand |
||||||
Absolute emissions - Scope 1 |
MnT |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
Absolute emissions - Scope 2 |
MnT |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
Absolute emissions - Scope 3 |
MnT |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Total absolute emissions |
MnT |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.8 |
CO2 emissions intensity |
tCO2/tcs |
0.62 |
0.64 |
0.67 |
0.64 |
0.61 |
Calculations of Scope 1, 2, 3 emissions are as per worldsteel methodology |
GHG emissions (based on GHG Protocol) |
||||||
UOM |
FY - 18 |
FY- 19 |
FY - 20 |
FY - 21 |
FY - 22 |
|
Tata Steel Standalone |
||||||
Absolute emissions -Scope 1 |
MnT |
- |
- |
- |
32.5 |
49.7 |
Absolute emissions - Scope 2 |
MnT |
- |
- |
- |
3.9 |
5.1 |
Absolute emissions - Scope 3 |
MnT |
- |
- |
- |
5.2 |
6.4 |
Total absolute emissions |
MnT |
- |
- |
- |
41.5 |
61.2 |
Tata Steel Long Products Limited |
||||||
Absolute emissions - Scope 1 |
MnT |
- |
- |
- |
3.9 |
4.1 |
Absolute emissions - Scope 2 |
MnT |
- |
- |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Absolute emissions - Scope 3 |
MnT |
- |
- |
- |
0.6 |
0.6 |
Total absolute emissions |
MnT |
- |
- |
- |
4.5 |
4.7 |
Tata Steel UK |
||||||
Absolute emissions - Scope 1 |
MnT |
- |
- |
- |
6.6 |
7.0 |
Absolute emissions - Scope 2 |
MnT |
- |
- |
- |
0.2 |
0.2 |
Absolute emissions - Scope 3 |
MnT |
- |
- |
- |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Total absolute emissions |
MnT |
- |
- |
- |
7.7 |
8.3 |
Tata Steel Netherlands |
||||||
Absolute emissions - Scope 1 |
MnT |
- |
- |
- |
11.0 |
11.7 |
Absolute emissions - Scope 2 |
MnT |
- |
- |
- |
0.7 |
0.8 |
Absolute emissions - Scope 3 |
MnT |
- |
- |
- |
1.8 |
1.8 |
Total absolute emissions |
MnT |
- |
- |
- |
13.6 |
14.2 |
Tata Steel Thailand |
||||||
Absolute emissions - Scope 1 |
MnT |
- |
- |
- |
0.2 |
0.2 |
Absolute emissions - Scope 2 |
MnT |
- |
- |
- |
0.4 |
0.5 |
Absolute emissions - Scope 3 |
MnT |
- |
- |
- |
0.2 |
0.2 |
Total absolute emissions |
MnT |
- |
- |
- |
0.8 |
0.9 |
Tata Steel Consolidated (including other TSL entities )* |
||||||
Absolute emissions - Scope 1 |
MnT |
- |
- |
- |
66.0 |
75.7 |
Absolute emissions - Scope 2 |
MnT |
- |
- |
- |
4.8 |
5.6 |
Absolute emissions - Scope 3 |
MnT |
- |
- |
- |
12.6 |
11.9 |
Total absolute emissions |
MnT |
- |
- |
- |
83.4 |
93.2 |
* Worldsteel methodology allows credits due to export to various co-products / byproducts (incl. gases). No such credits are included in GHG Protocol estimation. Scope 1.1 emissions under worldsteel scope considered direct emissions under scope 1 for steelmaking sites. Consolidated emissions of Tata Steel has been arrived at by using equity based approach For TSJ, TSK and TSM, Absolute Scope 1 emissions are 46.7 MntCO2e, Absolute Scope 2 emissions are 4.4 MntCO2e, Absolute Scope 3 emissions are 1.5 MntCO2e. |
Air emissions |
||||||
UOM |
FY - 18 |
FY - 19 |
FY - 20 |
FY - 21 |
FY - 22 |
|
Tata Steel Standalone |
||||||
Stack dust emissions |
Kilo tonnes |
5.75 |
5.59 |
5.04 |
4.10 |
7.22 |
Dust emission intensity |
kg/tcs |
0.46 |
0.42 |
0.38 |
0.34 |
0.39 |
SOx emissions |
Kilo tonnes |
12.50 |
7.37 |
8.57 |
7.83 |
30.40 |
SOx emission intensity |
kg/tcs |
1.00 |
0.56 |
0.65 |
0.64 |
1.65 |
NOx emissions |
Kilo tonnes |
12.81 |
8.89 |
8.70 |
7.53 |
16.01 |
NOx emission intensity |
kg/tcs |
1.03 |
0.67 |
0.66 |
0.62 |
0.87 |
Tata Steel Long Products Limited - Gamharia |
||||||
Dust emissions |
Kilo tonnes |
- |
- |
1.69 |
1.17 |
1.03 |
Dust emission intensity |
kg/tcs |
- |
- |
2.86 |
1.81 |
1.50 |
SOx emissions |
Kilo tonnes |
- |
- |
5.11 |
4.88 |
6.01 |
SOx emission intensity |
kg/tcs |
- |
- |
8.66 |
7.53 |
8.79 |
NOx emissions |
Kilo tonnes |
- |
- |
0.97 |
1.08 |
1.21 |
NOx emission intensity |
kg/tcs |
- |
- |
1.64 |
1.67 |
1.77 |
Tata Steel UK (CY*) |
||||||
Dust emissions |
Kilo tonnes |
2.05 |
1.96 |
1.94 |
2.23 |
1.96 |
Dust emission intensity |
kg/tcs |
0.57 |
0.64 |
0.57 |
0.69 |
0.55 |
SOx emissions |
Kilo tonnes |
7.19 |
7.07 |
7.09 |
6.61 |
4.96 |
SOx emission intensity |
kg/tcs |
2.02 |
2.29 |
2.10 |
2.04 |
1.40 |
NOx emissions |
Kilo tonnes |
4.97 |
3.84 |
4.83 |
5.14 |
5.05 |
NOx emission intensity |
kg/tcs |
1.39 |
1.24 |
1.43 |
1.58 |
1.43 |
Tata Steel Netherlands@ (CY*) |
||||||
Dust emissions |
Kilo tonnes |
1.91 |
1.80 |
1.88 |
1.80 |
1.57 |
Dust emission intensity |
kg/tcs |
0.28 |
0.26 |
0.28 |
0.30 |
0.24 |
SOx emissions |
Kilo tonnes |
3.23 |
3.13 |
3.16 |
3.04 |
2.79 |
SOx emission intensity |
kg/tcs |
0.47 |
0.46 |
0.48 |
0.50 |
0.42 |
NOx emissions |
Kilo tonnes |
5.78 |
5.73 |
6.03 |
5.13 |
5.35 |
NOx emission intensity |
kg/tcs |
0.85 |
0.84 |
0.91 |
0.85 |
0.80 |
*Calendar year reporting (1 January - 31 December) |
Water |
||||||
UOM |
FY - 18 |
FY - 19 |
FY - 20 |
FY - 21 |
FY - 22 |
|
Tata Steel Standalone |
||||||
Fresh water consumption |
Million m3 |
48.7 |
46.3 |
40.8 |
32.9 |
50 |
Specific fresh water consumption |
m3/tcs |
3.90 |
3.50 |
3.10 |
2.7 |
2.71 |
Effluent discharge volume |
Million m3 |
11.5 |
10.3 |
9.5 |
8.3 |
9 |
Effluent discharge intensity |
m3/tcs |
0.92 |
0.78 |
0.72 |
0.68 |
0.52 |
Tata Steel Long Products Limited - Gamharia |
|||||||||
Fresh water consumption |
Million m3 |
- |
- |
6.79 |
6.78 |
6.99 |
|||
Specific fresh water consumption |
m3/tcs |
- |
- |
7.71 |
7.53 |
6.23 |
|||
Effluent discharge volume |
Million m3 |
- |
Zero process water discharge |
||||||
Effluent discharge intensity |
m3/tcs |
- |
Tata Steel UK (CY*) |
||||||
Fresh water consumption |
Million m3 |
17 |
19 |
22 |
28 |
31 |
Specific fresh water consumption |
m3/tcs |
4.83 |
6.01 |
6.51 |
8.73 |
8.70 |
Effluent discharge volume |
Million m3 |
17 |
33 |
20 |
18 |
21 |
Effluent discharge intensity |
m3/tcs |
4.71 |
10.79 |
5.76 |
5.40 |
6.02 |
Tata Steel Netherlands@ (CY*) |
||||||
Fresh water consumption |
Million m3 |
34 |
34 |
33 |
32 |
33 |
Specific fresh water consumption |
m3/tcs |
4.95 |
4.96 |
4.93 |
5.20 |
4.76 |
Effluent discharge volume# |
Million m3 |
179 |
182 |
194 |
185 |
204 |
Effluent discharge intensity |
m3/tcs |
26.3 |
26.6 |
29.0 |
30.4 |
30.6 |
Tata Steel Thailand |
|||||||||
Fresh water consumption |
Million m3 |
- |
1.85 |
1.95 |
1.72 |
1.73 |
|||
Specific fresh water consumption |
m3/tcs |
- |
1.80 |
1.59 |
1.28 |
1.22 |
|||
Effluent discharge volume |
Million m3 |
- |
Zero process water discharge |
||||||
Effluent discharge intensity |
m3/tcs |
- |
|||||||
*Calendar year reporting (1 January - 31 December) @ All figures for primary steelmaking, IJmuiden production site @ Total (scope 1+2+3): based on methodology of worldsteel, including credits for slag delivery to cement industry., Primary Steelmaking, IJmuiden production site # Sea water intake and return to sea ~161 million m3/year as for cooling Calculations of Scope 1, 2, 3 emissions are as per worldsteel V9.5 methodology |
Waste |
||||||
UOM |
FY - 18 |
FY - 19 |
FY - 20 |
FY - 21 |
FY - 22 |
|
Tata Steel Standalone |
||||||
Solid waste generated |
Kilo tonnes |
- |
- |
9,967 |
9,427 |
15,041 |
Solid waste utilised |
Kilo tonnes |
- |
- |
9,967 |
9,417 |
14,815 |
Solid waste sent to landfill / incineration |
Kilo tonnes |
- |
- |
|||
Solid waste utilisation |
% |
- |
- |
100 |
99.9 |
98.5 |
Tata Steel Long Products Limited - Gamharia |
||||||
Solid waste generated |
Kilo tonnes |
- |
- |
- |
947.2 |
1023.4 |
Solid waste utilised |
Kilo tonnes |
- |
- |
- |
1,057.1 |
851.2 |
Solid waste utilisation |
% |
- |
- |
- |
100 |
87 |
Tata Steel UK (CY*) |
||||||
Solid waste generated |
Kilo tonnes |
- |
- |
230.8 |
186.3 |
111.4 |
Solid waste utilised |
Kilo tonnes |
- |
- |
221.2 |
112.7 |
84.8 |
Solid waste sent to landfill / incineration |
Kilo tonnes |
- |
- |
4.27 |
3.62 |
6.58 |
Solid waste utilisation |
% |
- |
- |
95.9 |
60.5 |
76.1 |
Tata Steel Netherlands@ (CY*) |
||||||
Solid waste generated |
Kilo tonnes |
228 |
193 |
218 |
201 |
170 |
Solid waste utilised |
Kilo tonnes |
187 |
143 |
170 |
159 |
127 |
Solid waste sent to landfill |
Kilo tonnes |
35 |
48 |
42 |
36 |
38 |
Solid waste utilisation |
% |
82.0 |
74.1 |
78.3 |
79.1 |
74.7 |
Tata Steel Thailand |
||||||
Solid waste generated |
Kilo tonnes |
199.7 |
211.1 |
200.7 |
221.6 |
265.9 |
Solid waste utilised |
Kilo tonnes |
199.3 |
210.4 |
200.3 |
221.1 |
265.2 |
Solid waste sent to landfill / incineration |
Kilo tonnes |
0.35 |
0.70 |
0.36 |
0.46 |
0.69 |
Solid waste utilisation |
% |
99.9 |
99.7 |
99.8 |
99.8 |
99.7 |
* Calendar year reporting (1 January - 31 December) |
Energy |
||||||
UOM |
FY - 18 |
FY - 19 |
FY - 20 |
FY - 21 |
FY - 22 |
|
Tata Steel Standalone |
||||||
Specific energy consumption |
GJ/tcs |
25.11 |
24.35 |
24.17 |
24.11 |
23.62 |
Tata Steel Long Products Limited - Gamharia |
||||||
Specific energy consumption |
GJ/tcs |
- |
- |
29.16 |
29.25 |
32.47 |
Tata Steel UK |
||||||
Specific energy consumption |
GJ/tcs |
23.60 |
24.20 |
23.80 |
22.80 |
23.10 |
Tata Steel Netherlands# |
||||||
Specific energy consumption |
GJ/tcs |
20.06 |
19.99 |
19.79 |
20.22 |
20.38 |
Tata Steel Thailand |
||||||
Specific energy consumption |
GJ/tcs |
9.50 |
9.90 |
10.00 |
9.86 |
9.30 |
Biodiversity |
||||||
UOM |
FY - 18 |
FY - 19 |
FY - 20 |
FY - 21 |
FY - 22 |
|
Tata Steel Standalone |
||||||
Total sites covered under Biodiversity Management Plans (BMPs) |
% |
- |
- |
- |
52.3 |
61.9 |
Tata Steel Long Products Limited - Gamharia |
||||||
Total sites covered under Biodiversity Management Nos. Plans (BMPs) |
Nos. |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Initiated at 3 sites |
Tata Steel UK |
||||||
Discrete sites under |
Nos |
- |
- |
- |
- |
7 |
# Based on crude steel production volumes EMS - Environment Management System@ primary steelmaking, IJmuiden production site |
Management |
||||||
UOM |
FY - 18 |
FY - 19 |
FY - 20 |
FY - 21 |
FY - 22 |
|
Tata Steel Standalone |
||||||
Workforce (permanent+contract) working in EMS (ISO 14001) certified steel production facilities |
% |
- |
- |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Tata Steel Long Products Limited - Gamharia |
||||||
Workforce (permanent+contract) working in EMS (ISO 14001) certified steel production facilities |
% |
- |
- |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Tata Steel UK |
||||||
Workforce (permanent+contract) working in EMS (ISO 14001) certified steel production facilities |
% |
- |
- |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Tata Steel Netherlands |
||||||
Workforce (permanent+contract) working in EMS (ISO 14001) certified steel production facilities |
% |
- |
- |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Tata Steel Thailand |
||||||
Workforce (permanent+contract) working in EMS (ISO 14001) certified steel production facilities |
% |
- |
- |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Scrap recycling |
||||||
UOM |
FY - 18 |
FY - 19 |
FY - 20 |
FY - 21 |
FY - 22 |
|
Tata Steel Standalone |
||||||
Steel scrap recycled (internal & external) |
Kilo tonnes |
- |
- |
- |
598 |
1,252 |
Steel scrap recycled (internal & external) |
% |
- |
- |
- |
4.9 |
6.8 |
Tata Steel Long Products Limited - Gamharia |
||||||
Steel scrap recycled (internal & external) |
Kilo tonnes |
- |
- |
21.9 |
20.4 |
29.7 |
Steel scrap recycled (internal & external) |
% |
- |
- |
3.7 |
3.2 |
4.3 |
Tata Steel UK |
||||||
Steel scrap recycled (internal & external) |
Kilo tonnes |
559 |
531 |
497 |
554 |
596 |
Steel scrap recycled (internal & external) |
% |
16.0 |
17.1 |
14.7 |
16.9 |
17.5 |
Tata Steel Netherlands |
||||||
Steel scrap recycled (internal & external) |
Kilo tonnes |
1,095 |
1,140 |
1,150 |
1,019 |
1,137 |
Steel scrap recycled# (internal & external) |
% |
15.9 |
16.5 |
17.4 |
16.8 |
17.6 |
Tata Steel Thailand |
Primary raw material used is steel scrap which is 100% recyclable |
Spend on Climate Change and Environment |
||||||
UOM |
FY - 18 |
FY - 19 |
FY - 20 |
FY - 21 |
FY - 22 |
|
Tata Steel Standalone |
||||||
Spend on Climate Change and |
₹ crore |
544 |
286 |
283 |
139 |
554 |
Tata Steel Long Products Limited - Gamharia |
||||||
Spend on Climate Change and |
₹ crore |
- |
- |
- |
7.9 |
8.7 |
Tata Steel Netherlands |
||||||
Spend on Climate Change and |
Million Euros |
6.9 |
16.9 |
48.3 |
51.0 |
33.5 |
Standalone figures of FY 2021-22 includes performance of the recently merged business of erstwhile TSBSL now renamed as Tata Steel Meramandali (TSM). We are horizontally deploying best practices of our Jamshedpur and Kalinganagar facillities at Meramandali and plan to improve its environmental performance to best possible level in due course of time. |
Social |
||||||
Health & Safety |
||||||
UOM |
FY - 18 |
FY - 19 |
FY - 20 |
FY - 21 |
FY - 22 |
|
Tata Steel Standalone |
||||||
Fatalities |
Nos. |
3 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
Lost-time Injury (LTI) - employee |
Nos. |
42 |
38 |
58 |
48 |
58 |
Lost-time Injury (LTI) – contractor |
Nos. |
22 |
30 |
69 |
47 |
107 |
Lost-time Injury (LTI) – Total |
Nos. |
64 |
68 |
127 |
95 |
165 |
Lost-time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR) - employee |
Index |
0.50 |
0.47 |
0.78 |
0.63 |
0.67 |
Lost-timeInjury Frequency Rate (LTIFR) – contractor |
Index |
0.16 |
0.19 |
0.4 |
0.49 |
0.55 |
Lost-time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR) – Total |
Index |
0.29 |
0.29 |
0.52 |
0.55 |
0.59 |
Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate (TRIFR) - employee |
Index |
- |
2.21 |
3.20 |
2.74 |
2.31 |
Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate (TRIFR) - contractor |
Index |
- |
0.98 |
1.38 |
1.81 |
2.24 |
Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate (TRIFR) - Total |
Index |
- |
1.39 |
1.93 |
2.22 |
2.26 |
Sites with Safety Management System (ISO 45001/ OHSAS 18001) |
% |
- |
- |
- |
100 |
100 |
Organisational Health Index |
Score out of 16 |
12.47 |
12.62 |
12.7 |
12.83 |
13.05 |
Tata Steel Long Products Limited |
||||||
Fatalities Nos. |
Nos. |
- |
- |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Lost-time Injury (LTI) – employee Nos. |
Nos. |
- |
- |
- |
3 |
7 |
Lost-time Injury (LTI) – contractor Nos. |
Nos. |
- |
- |
- |
21 |
7 |
Lost-time Injury (LTI) – Total Nos. |
Nos. |
- |
- |
15 |
24 |
14 |
Lost-time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR) – Total |
Index |
- |
- |
1.07 |
1.38 |
0.66 |
Sites with Safety Management System |
% |
- |
- |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Tata Steel UK |
||||||
Fatalities Nos. |
Nos. |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
Lost-time Injury (LTI) – employee |
Nos. |
25 |
19 |
36 |
30 |
33 |
Lost-time Injury (LTI) – contractor |
Nos. |
7 |
8 |
7 |
9 |
15 |
Lost-time Injury (LTI) – Total |
Nos. |
32 |
27 |
43 |
39 |
48 |
Lost-time Injury Frequency Rate |
Index |
1.47 |
1.13 |
2.25 |
1.93 |
2.1 |
Lost-time Injury Frequency Rate |
Index |
1.42 |
1.61 |
1.43 |
2.1 |
3.17 |
Lost-time Injury Frequency Rate |
Index |
1.46 |
1.24 |
2.06 |
1.97 |
2.35 |
Sites with Safety Management System |
% |
- |
- |
4.76 |
15 |
16.66 |
Tata Steel Netherlands |
||||||
Fatalities |
Nos. |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Lost-time Injury (LTI) – employee |
Nos. |
19 |
19 |
18 |
17 |
19 |
Lost-time Injury (LTI) – contractor |
Nos. |
11 |
20 |
13 |
9 |
8 |
Lost-time Injury (LTI) – Total |
Nos. |
30 |
39 |
31 |
26 |
27 |
Lost-time Injury Frequency Rate |
Index |
1.02 |
1.03 |
0.99 |
0.93 |
1.01 |
Lost-time Injury Frequency Rate |
Index |
2.24 |
3.71 |
3.31 |
2.81 |
2.36 |
Lost-time Injury Frequency Rate |
Index |
1.27 |
1.63 |
1.40 |
1.21 |
1.21 |
Sites with Safety Management System |
% |
0 |
0 |
24 |
28 |
36 |
Tata Steel Thailand |
||||||
Fatalities |
Nos. |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Lost-time Injury (LTI) – employee |
Nos. |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Lost-time Injury (LTI) – contractor |
Nos. |
0 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
Lost-time Injury (LTI) – Total |
Nos. |
1 |
7 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
Lost-timeInjury Frequency Rate |
Index |
0.35 |
1.5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Lost-time Injury Frequency Rate |
Index |
0 |
1.07 |
0 |
0.42 |
1.34 |
Lost-time Injury Frequency Rate |
Index |
0.17 |
1.28 |
0 |
0.21 |
0.63 |
Sites with Safety Management System |
% |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Standalone figures of FY 2021-22 includes performance of the recently merged business of erstwhile TSBSL now renamed as Tata Steel Meramandali (TSM). |
Human Resource Management |
||||||
UOM |
FY - 18 |
FY - 19 |
FY - 20 |
FY - 21 |
FY - 22 |
|
Tata Steel Standalone |
||||||
Nos. of employees |
Nos. |
34,072 |
32,984 |
32,364 |
31,189 |
35,927 |
New employee hires |
Nos. |
- |
1,977 |
1,820 |
2,129 |
1,704 |
Employee productivity (steel volume) |
tcs/employee/ year |
768 |
800 |
803 |
745 |
854 |
Women in workforce |
% |
6.1 |
6.5 |
6.9 |
7.4 |
6.9 |
Women in management |
% |
11.1 |
11.6 |
12.0 |
12.6 |
11.7 |
Share of women in all management positions, including junior, middle and top management in workforce |
% |
- |
- |
12 |
12.6 |
11.7 |
Share of women in junior management positions in workforce |
% |
- |
- |
13.9 |
15.0 |
13.7 |
Share of women in top management positions in workforce |
% |
- |
- |
7 |
7.4 |
7.1 |
Share of women in management positions in revenue-generating functions in workforce |
% |
- |
- |
15.7 |
17.5 |
15 |
Share of women in STEM-related positions in workforce |
% |
- |
- |
4.6 |
6 |
5.7 |
Women Salary** |
Average salary in Executive level (INR, base salary only) |
- |
- |
- |
2,882,188 |
3,127,174 |
Average salary in Executive level (INR, base salary + other cash incentives) |
- |
- |
- |
9,998,262 |
10,698,140 |
|
Average salary in Management level (INR, base salary only) |
- |
- |
- |
603,513 |
654,812 |
|
Average salary in Management level (INR, base salary + other cash incentives) |
- |
- |
- |
2,176,059 |
2,328,383 |
|
Average salary in Non-management level (INR, base salary only) |
- |
- |
- |
1,103,556 |
1,061,922 |
|
Men Salary** |
Average salary in Executive level (INR, base salary only) |
- |
- |
- |
2,919,636 |
3,167,805 |
Average salary in Executive level (INR, base salary + other cash incentives) |
- |
- |
- |
10,072,894 |
10,777,997 |
|
Average salary in Management level (INR, base salary only) |
- |
- |
- |
816,926 |
886,365 |
|
Average salary in Management level (INR, base salary + other cash incentives) |
- |
- |
- |
2,521,325 |
2,697,818 |
|
Average salary in Non-management level (INR, base salary only) |
- |
- |
- |
1,234,908 |
1,190,100 |
|
Age break-up of the workforce (<30 years) |
% |
- |
15.1 |
15.5 |
18 |
23 |
Age break-up of the workforce (30 - 50 years) |
% |
- |
54.8 |
55.3 |
57 |
59 |
Age break-up of the workforce (>50 years) |
% |
- |
30.1 |
29.2 |
25 |
17 |
Employee turnover rate |
% |
6.1 |
6.4 |
6.8 |
7.5 |
6.9 |
Workforce covered through formal trade unions |
% |
89.3 |
88.9 |
87.4 |
86.1 |
79.6 |
Diversity Mix (% of employees who belong to categories of - Affirmative Action/Women/ % PWD/LGBTQ+) |
% |
- |
- |
19 |
20 |
18 |
Affirmative Action (AA) Community |
% |
17.3 |
17.3 |
17.5 |
17.2 |
11.9 |
Affirmative Action (AA) Community Representation |
% |
3.5 |
3.9 |
3.9 |
3.6 |
4.4 |
Breakdown* in workforce |
% |
17.3 |
17.3 |
17.5 |
17.2 |
11.9 |
Share of People with disability in workforce |
% |
- |
- |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.14 |
Share of LGBTQI+ people in workforce |
% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.01# |
Investment in employee training and development |
₹ crore |
- |
- |
133 |
152 |
159 |
Employee training |
Thousand person days |
194 |
248 |
253 |
199 |
413 |
Employee training |
Person-days/employee/year |
5.62 |
7.52 |
7.81 |
6.38 |
11.51 |
New employee hires – working level |
Officers (Nos) |
- |
854 |
812 |
575 |
710 |
Non Officers (Nos) |
- |
1,123 |
1,008 |
1,554 |
994 |
|
Total Hires (Nos) |
- |
1,977 |
1,820 |
2,129 |
1,704 |
|
New employee hires – Gender |
Female Hires (Nos) |
- |
280 |
276 |
322 |
395 |
Male Hires (Nos) |
- |
1,697 |
1,544 |
1,807 |
1,308 |
|
Open positions filled by internal candidates |
% |
- |
- |
73 |
67 |
78 |
Average hiring cost/FTE |
INR |
- |
- |
86,626 |
99,273 |
67,338 |
Employee Turnover Rate – All seperations |
% |
- |
6.4 |
6.8 |
7.5 |
6.9 |
Employee Turnover Rate – Gender |
Male (%) |
- |
- |
- |
7.5 |
7.6 |
Female(%) |
- |
- |
- |
6.3 |
11.9 |
|
Employee Turnover Rate - Working Level |
Officers (%) |
- |
- |
- |
7.9 |
12.3 |
Non Officers (%) |
- |
- |
- |
7.4 |
6.8 |
|
Voluntary Employer Turnover Rate |
% |
- |
1.1 |
1.3 |
1.1 |
2 |
Engagement Survey Score - TSL |
(%) |
74 |
NA |
78 |
NA |
NA |
Engagement Survey Score - Officers |
(%) |
66 |
NA |
65 |
NA |
69 |
Engagement Survey Score - Non-Officers *** |
(%) |
77 |
NA |
83 |
NA |
NA |
Engagement Survey for Officers – Gender |
Male (%) |
NA |
NA |
66 |
NA |
70 |
Female(%) |
NA |
NA |
61 |
NA |
60 |
|
Engagement Survey for Officers – Age Group |
60+ Years (%) |
NA |
NA |
86 |
NA |
- |
51-55 Years (%) |
NA |
NA |
80 |
NA |
86 |
|
56-59 Years (%) |
NA |
NA |
85 |
NA |
86 |
|
46-50 Years (%) |
NA |
NA |
75 |
NA |
81 |
|
41-45 Years (%) |
NA |
NA |
70 |
NA |
78 |
|
36-40 Years (%) |
NA |
NA |
66 |
NA |
68 |
|
31-35 Years (%) |
NA |
NA |
55 |
NA |
61 |
|
26-30 Years (%) |
NA |
NA |
49 |
NA |
51 |
|
18-25 Years (%) |
NA |
NA |
53 |
NA |
51 |
|
Engagement Survey for Non-Officers – Gender |
Male (%) |
- |
- |
85 |
- |
- |
Female(%) |
- |
- |
86 |
- |
- |
|
Engagement Survey for Non-Officers – Age Group |
60+ Years (%) |
- |
- |
91 |
- |
- |
51-55 Years (%) |
- |
- |
91 |
- |
- |
|
56-59 Years (%) |
- |
- |
91 |
- |
- |
|
46-50 Years (%) |
- |
- |
89 |
- |
- |
|
41-45 Years (%) |
- |
- |
85 |
- |
- |
Tata Steel Long Products Limited |
||||||
Nos. of employees |
Nos. |
- |
- |
2,496 |
2,395 |
2,357 |
New employee hires |
Nos. |
- |
- |
51 |
19 |
106 |
Employee productivity (steel volume) |
tcs/employee/ year |
- |
- |
456 |
548 |
665 |
Female employees in workforce |
% |
- |
- |
2.2 |
2.4 |
2.8 |
Female employees in management positions in % workforce |
% |
- |
- |
0.6 |
0.7 |
1.2 |
Age break-up of the workforce (<30 years) |
% |
- |
- |
9.9 |
8.0 |
6.6 |
Age break-up of the workforce (30 - 50 years) |
% |
- |
- |
67.7 |
69.6 |
70.7 |
Age break-up of the workforce (>50 years) |
% |
- |
- |
22.5 |
22.5 |
22.7 |
Employee turnover rate |
% |
- |
- |
1.2 |
1.2 |
2.5 |
Employee training |
Thousand person days |
- |
- |
10.2 |
30.46 |
43.04 |
Employee training |
Person-days/employee/year |
- |
- |
4.09 |
12.72 |
18.26 |
Tata Steel Europe (UK + Netherlands business) |
||||||
Nos. of employees |
Nos. |
21,247 |
21,454 |
20,379 |
20,047 |
20,161 |
New employee hires |
Nos. |
1,855 |
1,881 |
1,077 |
923 |
1,708 |
Female employees in workforce |
% |
11.1 |
11.1 |
11.2 |
11 |
10.8 |
Female employees in management positions in % workforce |
% |
16.9 |
18.1 |
18.2 |
18 |
18.1 |
Age break-up of the workforce (<30 years) |
% |
13.9 |
15.1 |
14.2 |
13.7 |
14.2 |
Age break-up of the workforce (30 - 50 years) |
% |
43 |
42.2 |
41.5 |
41.5 |
41.8 |
Age break-up of the workforce (>50 years) |
% |
43.1 |
42.7 |
44.3 |
44.8 |
44.0 |
Employee turnover rate |
% |
14.4 |
7.2 |
9.3 |
5.5 |
7.1 |
Employee productivity (steel volume)@ |
tcs/employee/ year |
490 |
467 |
491 |
466 |
489 |
Tata Steel Thailand |
||||||
Nos. of employees |
Nos. |
1,236 |
1,187 |
1,151 |
1,101 |
1,092 |
New employee hires |
Nos. |
91 |
60 |
35 |
2 |
26 |
Employee productivity (steel volume) |
tcs/employee/ year |
985 |
972 |
1,043 |
1,184 |
1,221 |
Female employees in workforce |
% |
16.7 |
17.4 |
17.4 |
17.3 |
17.2 |
Female employees in management positions in % workforce |
% |
19.8 |
19.2 |
18.4 |
16.4 |
15.7 |
Age break-up of the workforce (<30 years) |
% |
24.3 |
22.8 |
23.5 |
17.4 |
14.7 |
Age break-up of the workforce (30 - 50 years) |
% |
65.8 |
66.0 |
63.3 |
67.9 |
68.6 |
Age break-up of the workforce (>50 years) |
% |
9.90 |
11.10 |
12.90 |
14.60 |
16.70 |
Employee turnover rate |
% |
4.40 |
6.50 |
4.40 |
2.00 |
1.60 |
Employee training |
Thousand person-days |
7.6 |
7.3 |
4.5 |
6.6 |
7.4 |
Employee training |
Person-days/employee/year |
6.2 |
6.2 |
4.3 |
6 |
6.8 |
Standalone figures of FY 2021-22 includes performance of the recently merged business of erstwhile TSBSL now renamed as Tata Steel Meramandali (TSM). Definition includes all employees at TSE which is different from India definition. *Affirmative Action (AA) includes Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) communities respectively # We have deployed 14 transgender trainees at West Bokaro, 12 at Kalinganagar & 15 at Jamshedpur. Trainees are not reported in EOR (Employee on Roll) ** Starting salaries for fresh hires from colleges is same, irrespective of gender, caste, religion or any other basis for differentiation. Thus, salary growth and differences (if any) thereafter are a function of individual performance. Hence, wage gap is not visible when comparing employee groups who joined at similar time at similar positions. ***This year , we have completed only officers survey till date |
Economic & Governance |
||||||
Ethics |
||||||
UOM |
FY - 18 |
FY - 19 |
FY - 20 |
FY - 21 |
FY - 22 |
|
Tata Steel Standalone |
||||||
Whistleblower cases*- Received |
Nos. |
- |
436 |
881 |
777 |
845 |
Whistleblower cases* - Closed |
Nos. |
- |
334 |
602 |
541 |
601 |
Whistleblower cases* - Open |
Nos. |
- |
102 |
279 |
236 |
244 |
Measures Taken for Whistleblower cases # |
||||||
Warning |
Nos. |
- |
- |
92 |
72 |
129 |
Discipline (others) |
Nos. |
- |
- |
56 |
53 |
80 |
Sexual harassment cases - Received |
Nos. |
16 |
20 |
34 |
21 |
22 |
Sexual harassment cases - Closed |
Nos. |
8 |
19 |
26 |
15 |
18 |
Sexual harassment cases - Open |
Nos. |
24 |
1 |
8 |
6 |
4 |
Measures Taken against Sexual harassment # |
||||||
Warning |
Nos. |
- |
- |
7 |
13 |
12 |
Discipline (others) |
Nos. |
- |
- |
12 |
9 |
14 |
Training on Tata Code of Conduct - officers |
Person-hours |
- |
4,003 |
17,064 |
26,458 |
31,142 |
Training on Tata Code of Conduct - |
Person-hours |
- |
7,080 |
2,763 |
5,086 |
14,630 |
Training on Tata Code of Conduct - |
Person-hours |
- |
23,798 |
24,307 |
15,380 |
60,898 |
Business associates** trained on |
Nos. |
- |
- |
- |
1,747 |
2,114 |
Tata Steel Long Products Limited |
||||||
Whistleblower cases*- Received |
Nos. |
6 |
5 |
19 |
31 |
34 |
Whistleblower cases* - Closed |
Nos. |
6 |
5 |
19 |
31 |
30 |
Whistleblower cases* - Open |
Nos. |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
Sexual harassment cases - Received |
Nos. |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
Sexual harassment cases - Closed |
Nos. |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
Sexual harassment cases - Open |
Nos. |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Training on Tata Code of Conduct - |
Person-hours |
0 |
0 |
1,209 |
1,142 |
541 |
Training on Tata Code of Conduct - |
Person-hours |
- |
- |
1,060 |
636 |
828 |
Training on Tata Code of Conduct - |
Person-hours |
- |
- |
896 |
454 |
9,092 |
Business associates** trained on |
Nos. |
- |
- |
- |
35 |
235 |
Tata Steel Europe (UK + Netherlands business) |
||||||
Whistleblower cases - Received |
Nos. |
40 |
33 |
51 |
48 |
34 |
Whistleblower cases - Closed |
Nos. |
40 |
33 |
51 |
48 |
34 |
Training on Tata Code of Conduct |
No. of persons |
- |
75 |
180 |
135 |
105 |
Tata Steel Thailand |
||||||
Training on Tata Code of Conduct |
No. of persons |
91 |
60 |
35 |
2 |
26 |
*Exclusive of sexual harassment cases **Business Associate means suppliers, customers, vendors, dealers, distributors, franchisees, lessors, lessees or such other persons with whom Tata Steel has any business or transactional dealings including the Business Associate’s employees, agents and other representatives. |
Supply Chain |
||||||
UOM |
FY - 18 |
FY - 19 |
FY - 20 |
FY - 21 |
FY - 22 |
|
Tata Steel Standalone |
||||||
Active supplier base |
Nos. |
- |
>5,000 |
5,132 |
5,071 |
6,264 |
Local suppliers |
Nos. |
- |
1,316 |
1,806 |
1,671 |
1,944 |
Critical suppliers |
Nos. |
- |
- |
- |
- |
450 |
Business volume of local suppliers |
₹ crore |
- |
- |
- |
2,397 |
4,587 |
Number of Affirmative Action (AA) suppliers |
Nos. |
- |
70 |
70 |
71 |
71 |
Business volume of Affirmative Action (AA) |
₹ crore |
- |
75 |
61 |
53.5 |
70 |
Suppliers assessed based on safety |
Nos. |
- |
1,035 |
850 |
745 |
1,022 |
Suppliers trained through Vendor |
Nos. |
- |
1,426 |
1,330 |
844 |
450 |
Critical suppliers made aware on |
Nos. |
- |
- |
- |
223 |
327 |
Critical suppliers assessed on |
Nos. |
- |
- |
- |
200 |
258 |
Steel Processing Centers (SPC) assessed on |
Nos. |
- |
- |
- |
- |
31 |
Distributors assessed on |
Nos. |
- |
- |
- |
- |
106 |
Tata Steel UK |
||||||
Active suppliers |
Nos. |
3,735 |
3,584 |
3,354 |
2,808 |
2,851 |
Tata Steel Netherlands |
||||||
Active suppliers |
Nos. |
3,914 |
3,901 |
3,462 |
3,129 |
3,329 |
Tata Steel Europe (UK + Netherlands business) |
||||||
Active suppliers |
Nos. |
7,649 |
7,485 |
6,816 |
5,937 |
6,180 |
Active suppliers made aware on Responsible % Procurement Policy (RPP)* |
% |
83 |
86 |
88 |
90 |
91 |
*The percentage of active suppliers made aware on the RPP is the same across UK and Netherlands |
Intellectual Capital |
||||||
UOM |
FY - 18 |
FY - 19 |
FY - 20 |
FY - 21 |
FY - 22 |
|
Tata Steel Standalone |
||||||
Collaborations/memberships of academia and technical institutes |
Nos. |
34 |
40 |
50 |
20 |
35 |
Patents filed |
Nos. |
- |
- |
119 |
119 |
125 |
Patents granted |
Nos. |
- |
- |
58 |
109 |
121 |
New products developed |
Nos. |
- |
114 |
155 |
79 |
62 |
R&D employees* |
Nos. |
- |
- |
- |
246 |
270 |
R&D Spend |
₹ crore |
182 |
216 |
259 |
231 |
213 |
R&D Spend |
% of revenue |
0.30 |
0.31 |
0.43 |
0.36 |
0.17 |
Investment in new processes and products |
₹ crore |
2,709 |
3,893 |
5,008 |
2,353 |
6,501 |
Investment in new processes and products |
% of revenue |
4.6 |
5.65 |
8.52 |
3.71 |
5.1 |
Tata Steel UK |
||||||
Collaborations/memberships of academia and Nos. technical institutes |
Nos. |
- |
- |
- |
- |
7 |
New products developed |
Nos. |
8 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
R&D employees |
Nos. |
64 |
76 |
75 |
70 |
65 |
R&D Spend |
Million Euros |
9 |
11 |
9 |
7 |
10.5 |
R&D Spend |
% of revenue |
0.38 |
0.46 |
0.42 |
0.35 |
0.34 |
Investment in new processes and products |
Million Euros |
159 |
148 |
264 |
211 |
93.5 |
Investment in new processes and products |
% of revenue |
6.67 |
6.15 |
12.32 |
10.68 |
2.99 |
Tata Steel Netherlands |
||||||
Collaborations/memberships of academia and |
Nos. |
- |
- |
- |
- |
158 |
Patents granted |
Nos. |
155 |
137 |
133 |
142 |
202 |
Patents filed*** |
Nos. |
32 |
32 |
36 |
19 |
15 |
New products developed |
Nos. |
15 |
17 |
20 |
12 |
10 |
R&D employees |
Nos. |
311 |
316 |
311 |
300 |
299 |
R&D Spend |
Million Euros |
63 |
63 |
57 |
54 |
62 |
R&D Spend |
% of revenue |
1.23 |
1.16 |
1.20 |
1.24 |
0.90 |
Investment in new processes and products |
Million Euros |
160 |
129 |
111 |
64 |
73 |
Investment in new processes and products |
% of revenue |
3.10 |
2.40 |
2.36 |
1.47 |
1.06 |
Standalone figures of FY 2021-22 includes performance of the recently merged business of erstwhile TSBSL now renamed as Tata Steel Meramandali (TSM). *Includes contract employees **Based on worldsteel association methodology ***The patents filed refer to priority (i.e. first) filings. |
Policy Influence |
||||||
UOM |
FY - 18 |
FY - 19 |
FY - 20 |
FY - 21 |
FY - 22 |
|
Tata Steel Standalone |
||||||
Contribution to Industry/Trade associations or |
In Million USD |
- |
0.66 |
0.71 |
0.63 |
0.79 |
Key issues or topics successfully advocated in last few years & contribution to specific industry bodies (in Million USD) |
In Million USD |
1. Increase per capita consumption of steel through advocacy and collaboration |
0.19 |
|||
2. Addressal of issues, concerns and challenges common of the Indian steel industry with government and other stakeholders within all applicable laws and regulations to improve the ease & cost of doing business. |
0.12 |
|||||
3. Leadership on all major strategic issues impacting the steel industry, particularly focusing on economic, steel demand, environmental and social sustainability |
0.27 |
|||||
4. Building sustainable steel industry worldwide and fulfill the Indian government’s nationally declared targets |
0.04 |
|||||
5. Aligning strategies and operation with SDGs (sustainable developmental goals) & universal principles on numerous societal importance. |
0.02 |
* Please note that Lobbying in any form is not allowed as per Indian law, however as responsible corporate, Tata Steel advocates policy changes through different association for betterment of the industry at large.